|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
[Order David Horowitz’s new book, America Betrayed, HERE.]
For decades, women have been told that they should put career ahead of marriage and family. But who is really benefitting from women who buy into this mindset?
PragerU CEO Marissa Streit speaks with former feminist Peachy Keenan and Libs of TikTok founder Chaya Raichik about how modern feminism has harmed women.
Don’t miss this short video below:
Not benefiting the women? Well, it certainly isn’t benefitting the men (outside of a very small circle of Alphas). These gals want a society where men have an “incentive” to commit to families … which most men want. Most men aren’t “male predators”. Men can’t have families without female cooperation. They can’t know if the kids in the house are theirs without the loyalty of the mother, which is not possible in a culture of promiscuity. These women want a culture where women don’t do “slut pride”, “body counts” or (perhaps) “shout” their abortion. They want a culture where traditional women are faithful to their mates, are protected and valued as females, and are not required to work at soul crushing jobs (which nearly all men do) etc.
There’s a name for this kind of culture.
It’s called Patriarchy.
We don’t do that any more.
Business & government are the two beneficiaries. The former due to increased job competition, the later because of the massive expansion of “necessary” government programs.
Feminism.. as if women in the West had never been in positions of equality, if not power, at home, in their domains, or even in their countries since the beginning of Christianity! Only blatant ignorance of the facts could lead someone to believe it.
Why this campaign to ‘liberate’ women who never were enslaved? One has to recall the conversation between “democrats” AAron Russo, who reported it, and Nick Rockefeller whose foundation organized it:
“Aaron, what do you think ‘women’s liberation’ was about?”
And I said — I had pretty conventional thinking about it at that point — I said I think it’s about women having the right to work, getting equal pay with men, just like they won the right to vote.
And he started to laugh and he said: “You’re an idiot.” And I said: Why am I an idiot?
He said, “Let me tell you what that was about. We, the Rockefellers, funded that. We funded Women’s Lib. And we’re the ones who got it all over the newspapers and televisions — The Rockefeller Foundation. You want to know why?”
There were two primary reasons.
And one reason was: “We couldn’t tax half the population, before Women’s Lib. And the second reason was: Now we get the kids in school at an early age. We can indoctrinate the kids how to think. So that it breaks up the family. Your kids start looking at the State as the family. As the school, as the officials as their family, not as the parents teaching them.”
Isn’t exactly what happened? Now too often, strangers run the home, raise (if not abuse) the kids and take care (if not abuse) the old, while women try to prove what was obvious from the beginning, i.e. that man and woman are different but equal, whatever the role they play in life. Women can vote, but they haven’t as much influence in politics as their sisters of the 17th, 18th or 19th centuries. And contrary to the promise of the suffragettes, their access to the voting booth hasn’t brought an end to wars – not by a long shot!
We women have been had, big time!
Mostly Trial Lawyers and the Stink Pink bunch or lose screws
I’ve come to realize that feminism has invested a profound sense of inferiority in women in that their natural womanhood is irrelevant and they’re better off competing with men. Feminism inherently assumes an inferiority in woman nature. This goes back to 1st wave feminism with Virginia Wolff bemoaning the role of “angel of the house” thus motivating cherubicide!
Having read read Betty Friedan’s seminal work, the Feminine Mystique, it seemed she was obsessed with a significant envy of the males at university and sought to take their roles … this role switch behavior has been increasing since then.
Her description of raising children as being like a concentration camp struck me as such a deep alienation of her own woman nature so as to be psychotic (Jung noted that a male thinking he’s pregnant is psychotic).