[Order David Horowitz’s and John Perazzo’s new booklet: “Internal Radical Service: Abuse Of Taxpayer Dollars To Advance Leftwing Causes Illegally And Unconstitutionally”: CLICK HERE.]
Last year the Southern Poverty Law Center announced that it would spend $100 million on voter outreach in five states including Georgia and Florida. Beneficiaries include Alabama Forward, a coalition that encompasses local chapters of the ACLU, the NAACP, William J. Barber II’s Poor People’s Campaign and the Black Voters Matter Fund. BVM has been credited with boosting black turnout to enable the elections of Doug Jones, Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff.
“Georgia voters practically handed victories to President-elect Joe Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris with a historic election outcome,” BVM head LaTosha Brown boasted. “Georgia owes tremendous gratitude to its Black voters, who turned out and voted in record numbers — just as they did in November.”
“For years, our organization has been reaching into Black communities to help them harness and leverage their voting power — and that work does not end on Election Day,” she added.
The Southern Poverty Law Center is a 501(c)(3) so it’s supposed to be non-partisan and is not allowed to get involved in elections. Alabama Forward is also a C3, BVM however is a C4. How is it possible for nonprofits to pour tax-exempt money into Democrat election efforts? The answer, as Internal Radical Service by David Horowitz and John Perazzo, a pamphlet from the David Horowitz Freedom Center, reveals is that the IRS has enabled the rise of a Democrat empire of nonprofits funding everything from race riots to illegal migration to partisan elections.
The SPLC’s $100 million fund sounds like a lot, but it’s a small piece of a massive pie that is estimated to be in the billions. Federal, state and local governments, leftist foundations and nonprofits are distributing a vast fortune in funds aimed at voter engagement and registration. The vast majority of that money is directed at enhancing Democrat voter turnout by targeting demographics, young people, immigrants, minorities, and single women who are statistically more likely to vote for their party. Formally, voter registration and outreach is considered nonpartisan if it doesn’t endorse specific candidates, but the demographic targeting makes a mockery of the regulations and is aimed at boosting Democrat voter turnout in elections.
The Democrats benefit from a massive voter turnout machine funded by taxpayers either directly in the form of grants or indirectly through the nonprofit status of the organizations.
The networks of George Soros and Pierre Omidyar, a former Nazi collaborator and Franco-Persian tech tycoon, had urged, “We will need to mobilize more than a billion dollars to uphold the integrity of our election process and ensure diverse, equitable participation.”
Diverse and equitable participation are the kind of terms that allow foundations and nonprofits to fund systemically partisan demographic targeting for the Democrats to help them win elections.
The New York Times quoted a Democratic donor expressing concern that “organizations working on voter registration” are not being fully funded due to Soros and Omidyar not coming through with the cash. As the paper put it, nonprofits “have taken advantage of provisions in the tax code that allow them to engage in the political sphere through efforts that are technically nonpartisan, like voter education and registration” with charities spending millions of dollars for the “pinpoint targeting of demographic groups that typically vote Democratic.”
Earlier this year, the Voter Participation Center, a C3 nonprofit run by a Democrat strategist, which spent over $100 million on voter outreach, announced that it was taking part in Michelle Obama’s midterm push through When We All Vote. When We All Vote claims to have played a role in registering over half a million voters. The voter outreach component is part of Civic Nation, a C3, whose board is headed by Valerie Jarrett and other former Obama administration members. Its leadership team consists of former Obama campaign staffers and operatives.
Kyle Lierman, the CEO of both When We All Vote and Civic Nation, was Obama’s field organizer and an associate director at the Office of Public Engagement. Lauren Kidwell, the COO, was Obama’s Midwest Field Director and a partner at 270 Strategies, a Democrat consulting firm created by Obama vets. Bobby Brady-Sharp, its managing director, was a field organizer for Obama, and then a state director for the Biden campaign.
Despite being an obvious Democrat voter turnout operation run by experienced Democrat campaign organizers, Civic Nation claims that it “is organized exclusively for charitable and educational purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the International Revenue Code.” Donations to it are tax deductible. But if that’s a charity, so is the Democrat Party.
The head of the Voter Participation Center explains that it is a “nonpartisan, nonprofit civic engagement organization that works to ensure the New American Majority — people of color, young people and unmarried women — engage in democracy equal to their presence in society through voter registration, mobilization and education.” There’s nothing nonpartisan about this.
As Internal Radical Service by David Horowitz and John Perazzo lays out, Democrats have built a massive nonprofit political machine funded by taxpayers and abetted by the IRS. The DNC can afford to spend a mere $5 million on its voter registration campaign because most of the work is already being done for it by an army of nonprofits with nearly infinite budgets.
Previous Democrat abuses, most prominently by the Ford Foundation which under President McGeorge Bundy, a spook and former member of the Kennedy administration, had gotten into the business of funding Democrat politicians and campaign organizations, had led to the Tax Reform Act of 1969.
Unfortunately the law, embedded in IRS regulations, bars a foundation from “conducting or paying the expenses of conducting a voter registration drive limited to the geographic area covered by the campaign”, but not a particular demographic group. However current IRS regulations state that C3s “are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign”. It further warns that, “voter education or registration activities with evidence of bias” that would “have the effect of favoring a candidate or group of candidates, will constitute prohibited participation or intervention.”
The entire strategic point of nonprofit voter outreach is to have the effect of favoring particular candidates from a particular party. Even the New York Times has admitted that much is true.
The IRS has failed to enforce its own regulations. And Congress has failed to properly update nonprofit and foundation regulations to bar not just voter registration drives in a particular area, but also targeting a particular demographic group: a glaring omission since the Ford Foundation’s funding of CORE’s black voter turnout helped trigger the 1969 bill.
And where the federal government proves unwilling to enforce the law, state attorney generals have the right and duty to investigate these abuses and state legislatures have the opportunity to crack down not only on ‘Zuckerbucks’, but on partisan nonprofit voter outreach charities.
While Democrats complain about how little taxes corporations pay, 90% of their political operation is a tax-exempt project, often funded by corporate interests and radical billionaires, for the purpose of robbing taxpayers and rigging elections. It’s time to make them pay.
Algorithmic Analyst says
Thanks Daniel, excellent expose.
Jeffrey W Belden says
The irony of it all. When are black voters ever going to realize that the democrat party hates and uses them is beyond me. A little bit of research will prove that, and more. The democrat party was also a model for the nazi party. They want freedom, but refuse to work or fight for it, makes them appear to be complete idiots, and most aren’t. What a shame.
Say no to teabaggers says
We will scrap 501c starting with conservative organizations that will keep the 87,000 new staff busy until 2024 and then we will look at liberals.
Gail says
The SPLC is a domestic terrorist organization and nonprofits/foundations are one of the biggest scams in this country.
Nicolas Carras says
“The SPLC is a domestic terrorist organization”
Exactly, they sow terror, are perverts with pervert methods. They are from an ethical point of view, total rotten.
A real leftist sect to fight.
stevenl says
They cheat because THEY CAN!
They stole because they could!
The rinos have made all these disasters possible for they have been colluding with their elitocratic buddies.
Wally Warbles says
You dont always need Guns, Masks and a Fast Car to rob a Bank all you have to do is join the Democrat Party
Raymond Paul Ascani says
Excellent, but don’t forget Unions and being forced into paying union dues or tax dollars to unions.
jjpeguerom@hotmail.com says
aspernatur repellat voluptatem nostrum consequatur voluptates aut incidunt laboriosam incidunt autem consequuntur quia ipsam eveniet nisi quidem. soluta quam eos velit sequi quidem et eos rerum impedit enim voluptatem est. quas sequi mollitia et ab hic perferendis illum aut et sit ea voluptas non rerum voluptas aliquam. omnis eum aspernatur enim perferendis qui ratione ut iusto. ut earum in molestiae adipisci maiores.
anniepetrone1@gmail.com says
omnis facilis repudiandae dolore vitae voluptas harum suscipit a corrupti tempore iusto eos eaque. est architecto iste reiciendis architecto inventore ut et dignissimos enim vel non ut iusto aut. laborum harum harum culpa voluptatem dignissimos nostrum est facilis quam quo rerum officia. molestias odit quia sequi aut. qui et molestiae ex maxime dolores minus blanditiis qui.
donnadavis5939@icloud.com says
suscipit eaque nisi ullam ea sint explicabo. sapiente qui laboriosam eligendi sit fugiat laudantium vel nemo minima sint officia saepe.
Rangermac66@gmail.com says
ad iusto ut qui iure laudantium adipisci qui quaerat. odio excepturi ex minus magni non.
lmolina2558@gmail.com says
reprehenderit dolor facilis pariatur repudiandae perspiciatis qui mollitia. provident consequatur doloremque quia quod a blanditiis officiis consequatur vitae cupiditate perspiciatis animi voluptatibus accusantium impedit sequi rem.
Jogrounds52@gmail.com says
esse harum hic facilis nemo tempora quae qui odio ut ipsam velit voluptas eaque. maxime occaecati rerum aut nulla hic at quo sint maxime sit animi nobis.
treymanny797@yahoo.com says
voluptas non officia eligendi exercitationem ut ipsa enim ratione. voluptate ut quis fuga voluptates minima ipsa quo tempore ex officia voluptas occaecati fugit ea rerum. minima a qui voluptas nostrum necessitatibus maxime repellat sed.
pioneershredder@gmail.com says
quam error iste fuga blanditiis eos quae. laudantium voluptas dolor culpa fugit vero sed enim facere rerum qui enim vitae.
cora.li@ovative.com says
rerum recusandae quo dolore qui eum itaque quam eos quos. tempora quia dignissimos alias ut.
keanhoe_lim@yahoo.com.sg says
ut sequi aliquam vel doloribus voluptatibus tempora praesentium adipisci commodi. distinctio facere ipsa enim.
wmsaccounting@alruralwater.com says
ut dolorem ut praesentium minima ipsam accusantium saepe ipsa expedita minima sed facilis ut quo vel quia. vel voluptas minima libero. omnis enim id quia hic dolor asperiores mollitia.
kiat_tay@yahoo.com.sg says
aut dolorem quo repudiandae ea quas eaque nemo magni fuga magni impedit. similique quisquam aut sed totam ducimus tempora deserunt esse.
Jclarksc@aol.com says
voluptatibus debitis id minus asperiores qui distinctio aspernatur aut in expedita maxime repudiandae. qui aspernatur mollitia qui quam itaque earum.
MISHA.RABINOVICH1937@GMAIL.COM says
incidunt alias suscipit fugiat aut ut omnis incidunt iusto id sed minima a consequatur omnis. velit dicta libero architecto cupiditate.
h0569117839@gmail.com says
debitis ut assumenda aspernatur. non reiciendis corrupti dolores quos a omnis.