Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
[Pre-order a copy of David Horowitz’s next book, America Betrayed, by clicking here. Orders will begin shipping on May 7th.]
Irena’s Vow is a 2023 film dramatizing the World War II heroism of a young Polish nursing student, Irena Gut. Irena’s Vow is a two-hour, color film. It was shot in Poland. The film is in English. It received a limited US release in April, 2024. Irena’s Vow has an 86% professional reviewer rating on Rotten Tomatoes and a 93% fan reviewer rating. Veteran reviewer Rex Reed calls Irena’s Vow “One of the most astounding holocaust stories.” He says, “It’s true, if fantastic.” The film is “anchored by the powerful, heartfelt performance of Sophie Nelisse as an innocent girl whose integrity and resolve turns her into a woman of maturity and strength.” Roman Haller, a Holocaust survivor, says, “It is a very great film. I expected a good film, but it is even more than I expected. … I saw my mother. I saw my father. I saw Irena … She was like a mother to me … I want to tell you there were people like that.”
Dr. Glenn R. Schiraldi wrote the 2007 book, World War II Survivors: Lessons in Resilience. He devoted a chapter to Irena Gut Opdyke. She was, he writes, “a diminutive, elegant woman with warm, radiant blue eyes and delicate features. She is one of the kindest, most loving women I have encountered. She reminds one of Mother Teresa. As she spoke, I often found myself choking back tears.”
Dan Gordon is a veteran screenwriter and also a former captain in the Israeli Defense Forces. Gordon says, “About 25 years ago, I was driving to my home in Los Angeles and listening to the radio. I heard a woman, Irene Gut Opdyke, telling her story. When I got home, I sat in the car in the driveway for another hour and a half, because I couldn’t stop listening.” He worked for years to get the film made.
Director Louise Archambault is a French Canadian. When she first viewed the script, she says, her reaction was “Wow. What an amazing woman. If that script had been fiction, I would have refused it” because no one would believe it. But, “I fell in love with that character.” Irena’s story is “relevant. We want to tell that story today in 2024.” Even though many films have been made about WW II, we haven’t seen, Archambault says, WW II from the eyes of a young Polish Catholic girl forced by Nazis to work for them. Approximately 1.5 million Poles were forced to work for Nazi Germany, often under slave labor conditions and at the cost of their health and their lives.
Because Archambault had a relatively meager budget of five million dollars and only twenty-nine days for shooting, she developed an intimate, rather than epic style. Irena’s Vow isn’t Saving Private Ryan; the deaths we see are of individuals; they are murdered in a sickeningly intimate way. Yes, there is horror in the story, but there is also genuine “love, hope, and light.” Archambault benefited from filming Polish actors, with a Polish crew, in Poland. They all know the history, she said; their grandparents lived it. They brought their personal experiences to the film. Also, “I put my energy on character, on human behavior.”
Events in Poland contributed to the set’s atmosphere. Refugees from Ukraine were arriving with their belongings in their hands and on their backs. “Every day we were reminded that war was going on next door.” There was a “big van” with “big guys” on the set necessary for insurance purposes. “If shooting starts here” – shooting with bullets not with cameras – “we need to get everyone out of here.”
Given how good this movie is, and how remarkable Irena’s story is, one has to wonder why the film has received so little publicity and such a limited release. I have my suspicions as to what cultural trends may have sidelined Irena’s Vow. More on that, below.
Before we talk about the film, a quick bio of Irena Gut Opdyke, in the context of world history. Before September 1, 1939, Irena Gut had lived a pleasant life. Born in 1922, she was the oldest of five daughters. Her father was a chemist and an architect. “My mother was a saint … my father was a wonderful man,” she would later say. “We were brought up in the Catholic faith. My mother really taught us the Ten Commandments … we have to be good to people and help people.” Irena also found God in nature. “There was a beautiful forest, and that was my God. I could kneel down by the beautiful tree and speak to God.”
The family could afford to hire a maid. Even so, Irena’s mother taught her daughter to cook and clean. Irena had to scrub the floor and her mother checked her daughter’s cleaning technique. Even if you marry a millionaire, Irena’s mother told her, you will still need to know how to cook and clean and maintain a pleasant home. The domestic skills Irena’s mother taught her daughter would eventually serve her in a fight for life for herself and others.
Irena told Schiraldi that her parents “taught us to help humans in need. There was always someone we had to help with food. For holidays like Christmas, we always had two or three chairs for invited guests. We helped gypsies … We brought every animal home that needed help – cats, dogs, birds.” One winter, the Gut family cellar sheltered a stork with an injured wing. Irena’s mother was skilled at rehabilitating birds. “She provided whatever old people needed – food, drink, or encouragement … Father and Mother did not distinguish among their friends – Jews, Germans, Poles – and neither did we. My parents were happy that we had many friends of different backgrounds.”
In a USC Shoah Foundation interview, Irena said she had no knowledge of the concept of “antisemitism.” “I know that we were all friends. There was no difference … In Poland, little girls were not taught politics.” She “dreamed to go to a far country to bring help.” She wanted to be like Florence Nightingale, so she became a nursing student.
On September 1, 1939, Nazi Germany invaded Poland. The week before, Hitler said, “I have placed my death-head formation in readiness – for the present only in the East – with orders to them to send to death mercilessly and without compassion, men, women, and children of Polish derivation and language. Only thus shall we gain the living space which we need.” The Nazi Generalplan Ost called for the reduction by mass killing of most Poles and the subsequent enslavement of the remnant population. Millions of Slavs, primarily Poles, Belorussians, various Soviet Slavic populations, and Serbs would be killed by Nazis. About four million persons from Eastern Europe would become forced laborers, often working under life-threatening conditions. Einsatzgruppen would commit mass shootings of educated Poles who might lead any resistance.
Nazi Germany’s Blitzkrieg assault on Poland was typified by the immediate mass murder of civilians. Nazi propaganda had insisted to Germans that Slavs and Jews were subhuman and any normal rules of warfare were not taken into consideration. Tens of thousands of Poles died in this initial assault, through bombing, the burning of villages, and mass executions by both invading Nazis and locals of German ethnicity who aided the invasion. When Warsaw surrendered on September 27, mere weeks after the war’s start, that city alone had lost 20,000 civilians.
On September 17, 1939, the Soviet Union, in accord with the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, attacked Poland from the east. World War II and the subsequent years when Soviet Communists seized and cemented their hold on power featured unimaginable horrors. These years were a grand guignol of “murders of prisoners of war and civilians, mass extermination in camps, show executions, slave labor, forced population displacement and deliberate demolition of cities, villages and settlements. During World War II, Poland suffered the largest human and material losses of all European countries in relation to the total population and national wealth.”
The Nazis and the Soviets were both genocidal powers and both were culturally as well as biologically genocidal. They didn’t just torture and murder people. They looted or destroyed museums, libraries, houses of worship, forests, and animal life. Both Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union committed sadistic atrocities. Millions of Polish Catholics were tortured, enslaved, murdered, or imprisoned. Poland’s centuries-old Jewish community, Europe’s largest and the second largest in the world, was all but erased. Nazis transported Jews from throughout occupied Europe to death camps in Poland.
V-E or Victory in Europe Day was finally celebrated on May 8, 1945, when Nazi Germany unconditionally surrendered. While many other victorious Allied nations could enjoy peace, Poland continued fighting against Soviet invaders. The Warsaw Institute reports that “following the end of WWII over 200,000 people were involved in partisan warfare. They fought for independence and against mass terror … The last Polish partisan died in combat against Soviet-led forces as late as 1963 … Warrant officer Antoni Dolega was the last soldier of the Polish Underground State who did not surrender. He stayed in hiding while being continuously chased down by the communists until 1982.”
Nursing student Irena Gut was seventeen years old in September, 1939. Her happy life was torn to shreds. Like thousands of other Poles, she moved from place to place, seeking refuge and a chance to resist Soviet and Nazi invaders. Her father was taken by Nazis. Irena didn’t know this, but they shot him. He was an educated Pole and had to die. Irena’s mother feared that her daughters would be, like other Polish girls, kidnapped by Nazis and forced to become sex slaves in brothels. Irena’s little sisters were eventually, she would later discover, forced to become “slaves in the clay mines.”
Irena, hoping to use her nursing skills, joined soldiers evacuating to the east. The east was no refuge. Irena and others attempted to hide in the forest. Young Irena had never even kissed a boy. Three Red Army soldiers found her, beat her, raped her, and left her unconscious in the snow. During the assault they had kicked her in the face and she was temporarily blinded after she regained consciousness. She went to work for Soviets and again she was subjected to sexual assault. She escaped and went west again. She was arrested by Soviets and interrogated “with threats of Siberia and torture.” But she got free.
Back in Nazi-occupied Poland, Irena attended mass. The church was surrounded by Nazis. This was a “lapanka,” a feature of everyday life in occupied Poland. Nazis would round up a group of random Poles. Some would be killed. Others would be sent to concentration camps. Still others would be conscripted into forced labor. Irena was forced to become a laborer in a Nazi munitions factory. Like most such laborers, she was underfed, and one day she fainted in front of Wehrmacht Major Eduard Ruegemer. Ruegemer complained to the foreman for using sick labor. Irena, recognizing that her life was at risk if she was not of use to the Reich, insisted, in German, on her ability to work.
Irena was young and beautiful, with blonde hair and blue eyes – the Aryan ideal. She was thirty-nine years younger than Ruegemer. She had learned German in high school. Her last name was “Gut,” a German surname. In fact many Poles, including Poles who resisted Nazis, like Maximilian Kolbe, August Emil Fieldorf, and the Ulma family, had German surnames. All these people identified as Polish. They spoke Polish, were born in Poland, and followed Polish cultural patterns.
There were Germans living in Poland, and also Czechoslovakia and the USSR. They spoke German and identified as Germans. Volksdeutsche was a Nazi term for such people. Those who identified with invading Nazis might gain advantages by identifying, not as Poles, but as Volksdeutsche. Appearing, as Irena did, to be Volksdeutsche and yet refusing to so identify and insisting on identifying as Polish could result in punishment. Even so, Irena told the major that she was Polish. “He asked me if I am Volksdeutsche. I say, I am Polish, and I am Catholic. That was my answer. So he said, you are honest, too. You don’t want to grab the opportunity to better yourself” – that is, by identifying as Volksdeutsche.
Irena’s father had made a similar choice. “He was a very proud Pole,” Irena would later say. “So they put a band on him with the letter P, Pole.” The badge to which Irena refers was worn by Poles performing forced labor. The purpose of the badge was to differentiate Poles from Germans. Any social mixing between Germans and Poles would be “Rassenschande,” or “race shame,” punishable by death.
Irena impressed Major Ruegemer, and he had her transferred to food service. Irena began work under a Wehrmacht cook, Schultz, “a short little guy with red cheeks … he showed me his wife and children picture.” Schultz, in spite of everything, made efforts to do the right thing. He could see that Irena was hungry and he set aside food for her.
One day Irena was setting tables. She heard shooting and dogs barking. She looked out the window and witnessed a Gestapo Aktion against Jews. She was horrified. Schultz put his hand over her mouth. “The SS is coming” to the dining room, Schultz said to Irena. “You don’t want them to think you are a Jew-lover.” Irena would later say, “It’s the first time I really know what was happening.”
Irena would witness many horrors, including Nazis tossing Jewish babies and toddlers into the air and shooting them. “I did see a SS man pull a baby from mother’s arm. It was a little infant. The baby was crying. And he just took the baby and threw it head to the ground.” Irena also witnessed a mass execution of Jews. “Behind the town was a dug shallow grave. They use machine gun. The lucky ones, they were dead. Because the earth was quivering with the breath of those that were buried alive. I never forget.”
Irena began to smuggle food into the Jewish ghetto, and she found other ways to resist. “I was cleaning the Major’s office. And on his desk I noticed stack of permits with a stamp from the Gestapo for the Jewish.” The stamp permitted some movement for the Jewish holder. “Well, I did have the idea when I was cleaning some of these I just put in my pocket.”
On one occasion, Irena smuggled a Jew out of the ghetto just after an Aktion. “I have the cart and I went. And there was a Gestapo standing right in this. Was just after Aktion … I realize now that I am a pretty young girl, speak German, with blonde and blue eyed, so I start playing the role.”
The Jewish woman Irena had arrived to smuggle out of the ghetto refused to leave. Irena insisted. “Your parents get killed there. You have to survive. Somebody has to tell what happened.”
To get food for Jews, “When I was serving dinner to the German officers and secretaries, I pleaded with them that I have a big family. I was like a Volksdeutsche, you know? I have family and they are hungry. And I have nephews, and nieces. And please if you don’t use your rationing tickets, would you please give it to me?”
In her prayers, Irena challenged God. How could he allow the murder of innocents? God, she believed, responded, telling her that he was God, that evil existed, that he was with her, and that he would help her. In her future efforts, she believed that God never asked her to do what she could not do, only to do what she could do, what was right in front of her.
Irena was placed in charge of Jewish laundry workers. She hid food in laundry baskets for them to find. She told Schultz that she needed extra blankets for herself. She suspected that Schultz knew she actually wanted them for the Jewish laborers, but he just gave her the blankets and said nothing more. Irena’s gestures earned the Jews’ trust.
Eventually Irena would become the cook and housekeeper for Ruegemer at his villa. Realizing what fate the Nazis had in store for Jews, she decided to hide twelve Jewish laundry workers there. One of her charges knew that the villa had been constructed by a Jewish architect, and assumed that there would be a hiding place. They found that hiding place – through a hidden passageway and under the gazebo.
Polish non-Jews who helped Jews risked death to their entire families and possibly neighbors as well. This Nazi edict was well publicized. One day Irena and other Poles were forced to watch as Nazis hanged a Polish family, including women and children, as well as the Jews this family had been hiding. “There is no way I can tell you – the little children screaming. Then the fighting for breath.” Irena was distraught. Irena had previously heard from an eye witness a report of Nazis massacring multiple random Poles in reprisal for one Polish resister damaging a Nazi’s car. Irena knew that by helping Jews she was risking her own life and the lives of all around her.
After witnessing the hanging, Irena returned to the major’s villa so distraught that she forgot to lock the front door. Some Jews were upstairs. The major entered next, and encountered the Jews. He would keep Irena’s secret, he promised, if she would have sex with him. She saw no way to refuse. Irena felt, as she put it, “very, very bad.” Irena did not tell her Jewish friends what she was doing for them.
Irena confessed to a young priest in Poland. That priest told her she had to stop all sexual contact with the major, even if that meant that Irena and the Jews would all be killed. “He didn’t understand,” she would say. “He didn’t give me absolution.” Irena later confessed to a priest in the U.S. This priest said, “My child, you were very young. There is no guilt in you because you did what you did to save others.” His words, she would say, “helped me to this day.”
As the Soviets advanced, Irena smuggled her Jewish charges to the forest, and she herself joined the Polish partisans there. She fell in love with a freedom fighter, the “very handsome” Janek, who was quickly killed. “And so I become widow before I become bride. I was so upset.”
When the war officially ended, Irena moved west to Krakow. She sought out the Jews she had rescued, and found some, but they knew she was not safe and that her presence put them at risk. The brother of someone she rescued was a Soviet soldier.
Invading Soviet Communists persecuted Poles, like Irena, who had resisted Nazis. “Soldiers of the AK are a hostile element which must be removed without mercy,” said Polish Communist leader Wladyslaw Gomulka. Roman Zambrowski, another Communist, said that the Home Army had to be “exterminated.”
Beginning as early as August, 1944, Soviet Communists arrested, disarmed, and interned 25,000 Polish soldiers, including 300 Home Army officers (Black Book of Communism: Poland the “Enemy Nation.”) “Smersh had its own jails, the NKVD had its own camps … for detained Poles. Between 1944–1946 various Soviet units held around 47,000 people, with no less than 25 per cent of Polish underground soldiers, and half of civilians detained being Polish citizens. In the spring of 1945 about 15,000 Silesian miners were sent to the mines in Donetsk area in USSR.” In short, the end of the war was not a time of peace, free of oppression, in Soviet-Communist-occupied Poland. (A Handbook of the Communist Security Apparatus in East Central Europe.)
Polish anti-Nazi resisters were tortured, murdered, and buried in unmarked graves by Soviet Communists in the post-war period. Others were sent to gulags. Those so victimized included profoundly heroic anti-Nazi resistance fighters like Witold Pilecki, who had volunteered to be smuggled into Auschwitz in order to lead a resistance there, and August Emil Fieldorf, who ordered the successful assassination of SS and Police Leader Franz Kutschera.
The Soviets arrested Irena and interrogated her for days, but she was very thin, and was able to squeeze through widely-spaced bars and escape. Irena’s Jewish friends dyed her hair black and gave her false papers identifying her as Jewish. She was smuggled into a refugee camp in Germany, where she faced a new enemy: diphtheria. After three years in that camp, William Opdyke, a United Nations employee, helped Irena Gut come to America.
Irena Gut found factory work her second day in the United States. “And I was alone, without money, family, marketable skills, not one word of English. But one thing I did have. I was free. And America did not owe me anything. I owed America. She adopted me. So second day in United States, I find myself working at garment center, vestment foundation. And I worked there for five years.” In 1956, by chance, she ran into William Opdyke again. Six weeks later, they married.
Mrs. Opdyke became a loving wife and mother. She did not share her wartime activity. “I put the biggest sign on my memory. Do not disturb!” In the 1970s, she learned of Holocaust denial, and she decided she would speak out. She especially valued speaking to young people. “I have a children that told me, Mrs. Opdyke, please, please forgive me. I say, for what? I am German. And I am so ashamed. I hug him. I say, honey, you’re not guilty. You were not born.”
Movies based on real people often add drama to make the real person’s story more interesting. Irena’s Vow has to make Irena Gut’s life less complicated, less overwhelming, in order to fit its two-hour runtime. Irena’s Vow compresses and streamlines Irena Gut’s saga. Sophie Nelisse, a twenty-four-year old French Canadian, won her first acting award when she was eleven, for the 2011 film, Monsieur Lazhar. Nelisse is superb as Irena Gut. Nelisse exhibits the beauty of a classic Greek statue. Jeannie Opdyke Smith, Irena’s daughter, says that she finds Nelisse’s depiction of her mother to be quite convincing.
Dougray Scott brings a combination of stoicism and pathos to his depiction of an elderly Wehrmacht officer experiencing forbidden lust for the Untermensch who has outwitted him.
Veteran Polish actor Andrzej Seweryn, who also did creepily effective work as a Nazi in Schindler’s List is touching as Schultz. In the film, Seweryn’s Schultz gives Irena a speech. In times like these, Schultz tells Irena, don’t look to the left. Don’t look to the right. Just look at your feet, and do the next thing. “Worry about you. Take care of you. Know only what you need to know.” Irena is horrified by Nazi atrocities. Schultz insists, “Don’t tell me. I don’t want to know. Just serve desert.” Of course she will be serving dessert to Nazis she just watched commit atrocities. “Sometimes survival depends on serving dessert,” says Schultz. Schultz’s advice informs the audience of how some survived Nazism. Of course Irena violates Schultz’s advice dramatically.
Maciej Nawrocki, a young Polish actor, is SS-Untersturmführer Richard Rokita. Nawrocki knows how to play a purely evil character and his scenes are blood chilling. Reviews tend to refer, obliquely, to one particular scene. I will eschew the circumlocutions used by others. Rokita pulls a baby from the mother’s arms and murders that baby, and then murders the mother as well. This scene plays out as the real Irena Gut herself described witnessing it and others like it. It’s a very hard scene to watch but it is also, one must say, masterfully shot and performed.
In another scene, equally as horrifying but much colder, Rokita explicates how genocide works, how the Nazis groomed Jews and bystanders. Nazis began small. “No one is going to revolt over a sign,” like “No Jews allowed.” But of course that sign is just the first step. “The circle constricts a little more. They get used to obeying. To being pliable. We use them up till there is nothing left.”
The real Rokita was a monstrously evil man. A survivor described one of his creepier traits; his soft-spokenness and his appeals for approval. “He always seemed to need approval from the prisoners for his every act … Rokita would often kill an inmate for some minor infraction—or no reason at all. And whenever he did he would actually try to persuade the rest of us that his actions had been for our own good. ‘The camp is less crowded now; there is more for all of you to eat,’ he would say to us almost pleadingly.”
Young Polish actors play the Jews Irena rescues. They are all given names and introductions. There is a doctor, a chemist, a nurse, a lawyer, an artist, a teacher. The scene that introduces them, slowly and carefully, one by one, reminds us that each victim of Nazism was a person just like us who had a name, a life, loves, and dreams.
Irena’s Vow moved me deeply. I was punching myself and mouthing imprecations at the screen. I felt as if I were with Irena, experiencing events with her. I don’t know if I found it so moving because Irena was so easy for me to identify with. I’ve never before seen a World War II movie where a female character was carrying the weight of the world on her shoulders in an act of heroism.
Why did Irena’s Vow, a quality film about an extraordinary, lovable, beautiful young heroine receive only a two-day theatrical release in the US? Why has it received so little publicity? I honestly have no idea. I can speculate, but my speculation is just that, guesses from someone who is not at all in the know.
1) Holocaust fatigue. Comments under the film’s trailer on YouTube express Holocaust fatigue. These posts say, paraphrase, “Oh, not another Holocaust movie. They are trying for an Academy Award because Holocaust movies are awards bait. We should make movies about other, lesser known atrocities.”
Here’s one such comment: “Another eternal reminder of Js…suffering. My people over 100 million Indigenous and Mexicans perished by the cruel hand of the Red, White, and Blue and their land stolen and US still not charged nor punished for their crimes. No movies, no support to our suffering, but these so-called survivors get all the attention.”
2) Antisemitism. Some of the YouTube comments that express Holocaust fatigue also express overt antisemitism. An example: “Forget that! The Jewish mafia is popping out movies of the Holocaust frequently now. Trying to make people feel sorry for them. These arrogant sobs don’t realize that people will look at what their doing to Palestinians is exactly what was done to them.”
3) Anti-Polish sentiment. Some, not all Jews and non-Jews cling to what I have called the Bieganski, Brute Polak stereotype. See here. In this stereotype, it is Polish Catholic peasants, not modern, educated, neo-Pagan Nazis who are responsible for the Holocaust. It is true that some Poles responded to occupation by profiting from Jewish suffering. There is a “szmalcownik,” or blackmailer, depicted in Irena’s Vow. These Poles sniffed out Jews in hiding and blackmailed them or their rescuers. Or, they handed Jews over to Nazis and received rewards. It is also true that some Poles committed atrocities against or just petty cruelties to Jews not for profit, but out of hatred or perversion. In the Bieganski stereotype, evil Poles express a true, essential Polish character. Polish rescuers are anomalies and discussing them undermines the Bieganski narrative – so it’s better not to discuss good Poles at all.
In the online USC Shoah Foundation interview of Irena Gut Opdyke, the interviewer, Renee Firestone, is audible, but Irena’s portion is all but inaudible. Irena tells a mind boggling story of personal suffering and outstanding courage and Ms. Firestone ignores all of that and focuses relentlessly on an assumed Polish antisemitism. Weren’t your parents, your schools, your church, your entire country, all antisemitic, Firestone hammers away at Irena. Only towards the end of the interview does Irena express some irk. She says that she raises funds for Israel and in this work people comment to her about “Polish concentration camps” and she corrects them. She says she has met Jews who were rescued by Poles. She asks them if they have submitted their account to Yad Vashem to include these helpers among the righteous, and they say no. This frustrates her.
4) Polish-American inaction. I learned of Irena’s Vow only through coming attractions in theaters where I had gone to see other movies. I am in touch with many Polish-Americans on Facebook and not a single one mentioned this film to me. In my experience, Polish-Americas tend to focus on cuisine. They post many posts about pierogies. Not so much about recent cultural products.
5) Goodness is boring. Audiences pay to see sex and violence and plots driven by action heroes. Irena’s Vow focuses on quiet, subtle ruses that advance human life: a hard sell.
6) Abortion. As Irena Gut Opdyke describes in her own memoirs, one of her charges became pregnant. The other Jews in hiding gave Irena a shopping list for the material necessary to perform an abortion. Irena debated with her friends. She said that she did not want to give Hitler another Jewish baby’s death. The abortion was never performed, and Roman Haller was born. He appeared at the premier of Irena’s Vow in Toronto to praise it enthusiastically. Any film that appears to regard abortion as wrong faces an uphill climb.
Danusha Goska is the author of God Through Binoculars: A Hitchhiker at a Monastery.
Aslan says
Interesting,I saw the movie.Well-down.Though it is true that antisemitism was rampant in Poland before the war as shown by the legal restrictions on Jews. All because the Jews there wanted to preserve their Yiddish language.All due to Polish extremism regarding nationalism. The case of Copernicus is an example,his mother was undeniable German, and the father was Polish,but then women stayed at home and the first language children learned was that of the mother. Later when Copernicus went to study in Italy he was a member of the German students association at the university.
Copernicus was born and grew up in Thorn,ruled by the Teutonic Knights,Germans,and from 1264 until 1411 it was part of the Hanseatic League,200 cities, where the lingua franca used by them was German. He was at least as much a German scientist as Polish. Then we have Lobachewsky,creator of non-Euclidean geometry in the 19th century,born in Russia,but whose parents were Poles.
Hanna says
“All because the Jews there wanted to preserve their Yiddish language.All due to Polish extremism regarding nationalism”
Yeah, sure, how did they dare to demand Jews having a working command of the lingua franca=Polish?
Aslan is a Turkish name. A nation that, because of Turkish extremism, supresses Armenian and Kurdish. Thanks fot the lecture on “nationalism”.
Jeff Bargholz says
Based on his writing, he definitely isn’t American or a native English speaker. In his comment above, his very first word, “interesting,” has a comma behind it instead of a period, he then spelled “done” as “down” in his comment. That isn’t a typo, it’s a mistake. The “W” key isn’t adjacent to the “N” key. And he put a hyphen between “well” and “down.” His next word is “though” which is how people who were taught British English express “although. And so on throughout his comment.
sue says
Hello Asian, You note Anti-semitism being “rampant” in Poland, and Polish Nationalism is of course “extremist” (under the: “All nationalism is equal, but some is more equal than others” Rule). But do you go far enough? Surely all us Poles/Polonians are WORSE THAN HITLER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! any day of the week – I refer you to Ms.Firestone of the Shoah Foundation in the above review?
Though having said that, am I going far enough? Isn’t just about everyone WORSE THAN HITLER!!!!!!!!!!!!! these days? So much so that the Exclamation Mark Mines are working overtime. So would it be more correct, more politically correct, to say that all us Poles/Polonians are More Horrid Than Anyone Else in Time and Space AND we shot Bambi’s Mother? (I refer you once again to Ms, Firestone).
A good review. And what a brave lady. Thanks Dr. .Goska. I can’t see it winning any Oscars though, as it seems so out of tune with the current version of WW2.
Intrepid says
Your command of English is minimal at best, A$$-licker. We don’t need moronic anti-semitic history lessons from you. We have enough morons pushing questionable history on us most days.
Buddy the Cat Meow says
When reading a nursing continuing education course on human trafficking, I could only take a few pages at a time, then I would have to calm myself before I could resume. The course was only about 10 pages, and it took me about 4 days to finish.
That being said, I don’t know that I could take this film about this lady’s ordeal. Honestly! But thank God for good people in a broke-down world at its worst.
Great background writing on Irena Gut and the war in Poland.
Quasimata says
Thank you!
This sounds like it needs to be seen by all, especially those in college. I will be looking for it, and telling everyone I know to see it also.
Karen A. Wyle says
An amazing story! I’m very glad Ms. Goska is spreading the word about Irena and this film. (One detail I found particularly ironic: a Gentile protected by false papers identifying her as a Jew, when so often it was the other way round.)
RAM says
A new book worthy of attention that focuses on one man’s heroism during and after WW2:
https://www.artscroll.com/Books/9781422640302.html
THX 1138 says
” Holocaust fatigue…. ”
War, catastrophe, tragedy, and man’s inhumanity toward man are not the meaning of life. Maybe it’s a good thing that most of mankind becomes exhausted of experiencing and seeing these horrible things. Maybe because the vast majority of mankind are not naturally depraved they get sick and tired of war movies.
“Goodness is boring…. ”
That depends on how you define goodness. Altruist, self-sacrificing, self-denying, self-immolating, “goodness” is bound to turn healthy people with a healthy self-esteem off and rightly so. As Ayn Rand correctly observed, “morality ends where a gun begins.” There can be no true morality during a war. Irena Gut’s life was as important as any life she saved and morally and properly her life should have been more important to her than the life of any stranger or ten million strangers.
The only thing that can be called a proper morality during a war is to end the war as quickly as possible by destroying the enemy with as little harm to your people as possible. If that means killing every enemy, woman, child, and baby so be it. This includes dropping nuclear bombs.
” Abortion…. ”
Abortion is a natural right, a woman’s life and body belong to a woman, and to no one else. Abortion is morally wrong only when undertaken wantonly and capriciously but even then, the government has no right to stop her or prosecute her as a murderer. The same applies to suicide, suicide is a natural right, but it is immoral to kill yourself wantonly or capriciously and the government has no right to interfere in a person’s choice to end their life.
“There are many legitimate reasons why a rational woman might have an abortion — accidental pregnancy, rape, birth defects, danger to her health. The issue here is the proper role for government. If a pregnant woman acts wantonly or capriciously, then she should be condemned morally — but not treated as a murderer.” – Leonard Peikoff
Mo de Profit says
Every young woman who had an abortion that I know personally have deeply regretted it. They feel pressure from dumb people who have no children of their own.
THX 1138 says
You seem to know a lot of dumb young women who become pregnant for all the wrong reasons and then take the advice of a lot of dumb, childless, people.
I have not said that abortion is never regrettable and painful, perhaps haunting the woman for life. But that is not the issue, the issue is that a woman DOES have the right to abortion be it ever so painful and regrettable.
Intrepid says
I’m glad you never had kids. They would be psychopaths, kind of like you.
Jeff Bargholz says
WTF? What does abortion have to do with a woman’s body? They don’t have themselves killed, they have their babies murdered, babies which had fathers.
THX 1138 says
“The status of the embryo in the first trimester is the basic issue that cannot be sidestepped. The embryo is clearly pre-human; only the mystical notions of religious dogma treat this clump of cells as constituting a person.
We must not confuse potentiality with actuality. An embryo is a potential human being. It can, granted the woman’s choice, develop into an infant. But what it actually is during the first trimester is a mass of relatively undifferentiated cells that exist as a part of a woman’s body. If we consider what it is rather than what it might become, we must acknowledge that the embryo under three months is something far more primitive than a frog or a fish. To compare it to an infant is ludicrous….
That tiny growth, that mass of protoplasm, exists as a part of a woman’s body. It is not an independently existing, biologically formed organism, let alone a person. That which lives within the body of another can claim no right against its host. Rights belong only to individuals, not to collectives or to parts of an individual.
(“Independent” does not mean self-supporting — a child who depends on its parents for food, shelter, and clothing, has rights because it is an actual, separate human being.)
“Rights,” in Ayn Rand’s words, “do not pertain to a potential, only to an actual being. A child cannot acquire any rights until it is born.”
It is only on this base that we can support the woman’s political right to do what she chooses in this issue. No other person — not even her husband — has the right to dictate what she may do with her own body. That is a fundamental principle of freedom.” – Leonard Peikoff
Intrepid says
Objectivism is one of those anti-human sick philosophies of the mid-20th C. Thank god it did not catch on. Instead of 60 million abortions a year there would be at least 100 million.
I’m not surprised that Lenny Peikoff’s wife is irrational and troubled. The two kids are probably a mess as well. She should get out of there and divorce this nut case.
Hannah says
Yes, “a woman’s life and body belong to a woman, and to no one else.” She is free to use contraceptives. If she chooses not to, any “potential human being” that begins is clearly NOT her body.
The Evidence: That “tiny growth of tissue” has a different DNA from the mother’s tissue.
To ignore that biological fact is to abandon Reason.
Buddy the Cat Meow says
Angels of Mercy have a purpose and are often found working in the direst of situations. Where else would you expect them to be? The Riviera? Tahiti? The Isle of I Don’t Give a Damn?
Give this woman some kind of credit.
Intrepid says
I’m not surprised you have Holocaust Fatigue. All those Jews and many others murdered, it’s just so inconvenient and tiring.
Better to cuddle up with a nice Objectivist book that extolls the virtues of abortion and condemns altruism, you know two of the pillars of the Nazi movement.
War movies? You actually have a beef with that as well?
CHARLES R DISQUE says
Amazing story. Just amazing. Thank you, Professor, for telling it so well. We must do what we can to understand evil, face evil, and struggle against it. There is plenty around today.
THX 1138 says
If you really wanted to understand evil you would have to begin by understanding the actual nature of altruism and self-sacrifice.
And if you really wanted to understand goodness you would have to understand Ayn Rand’s moral code of rational selfishness.
Every devout Nazi and Muslim Jihadist is acting from an altruist, self-sacrificing, moral code. Notice the altruist’s psychology here,
“The real Rokita was a monstrously evil man. A survivor described one of his creepier traits; his soft-spokenness and his appeals for approval. “He always seemed to need approval from the prisoners for his every act …”
Rokita’s moral sense did not lie within his own self and the facts of reality but in the opinion and approval of others. Altruism literally means “otherism”. The Muslim Jihadist does not rely on his own judgement of what is right and wrong by OBJECTIVELY looking at the facts of reality but by surrendering his self to whatever his Holy Scripture tells him to do. The Muslim Jihadist does not ask himself is this right or wrong in reality but does my action have the approval of God. Self-sacrifice, the sacrifice of your mind to other, is at the heart of Marxism, Nazism, Islam, and Christianity.
“To be a socialist,” says Goebbels, “is to submit the I to the thou; socialism is sacrificing the individual to the whole.”
By this definition, the Nazis practiced what they preached. They practiced it at home and then abroad. No one can claim that they did not sacrifice enough individuals.” – Leonard Peikoff, “The Ominous Parallels”
CHARLES R DISQUE says
Dear THX,
Thank you. It’s good to know you value “OBJECTIVELY looking at the facts.”
You and Ayn employ an extreme definition of ‘altruism,’ then shoehorn atrocities as examples of applied altruism. When Nazis murder non-Nazis- literally “others,” they are not pursuing “altruism,” which Ayn defines thusly: “Altruism demands that you regard everybody as a value except yourself.”
And Christianity certainly does not call for devaluing ‘yourself.’ It holds that you/we are made in the image of God, thus of unfathomable value. And the 2d greatest Christian commandment is “love your neighbor as yourself.” Not love your neighbor instead of yourself.
THX 1138 says
Ayn Rand is using the word “altruism” in its precise, philosophical, definition. The word altruism was coined and defined by the Kantian philosopher Auguste Comte.
It is true that in common usage most people believe altruism is simply a fancy word for kindness, generosity, and helping deserving others non-sacrificially (when you can, to the extent that you can, without harming yourself) but that’s not what it means at all.
The professional philosophers and theologians know precisely what Immanuel Kant and Auguste Comte mean by duty, self-sacrifice, and altruism and ultimately it is the professional philosophers and theologians that teach the morality of duty, self-sacrifice, self-denial, and altruism to their students as the highest moral ideal. Students like AOC who then go on to be elected to Congress or the White House and enact altruist-socialist-fascist policies based on the moral code of duty, self-sacrifice, altruism.
“All rights rest on the ethics of egoism. Rights are an individual’s SELFISH possessions—HIS title to HIS life, HIS liberty, HIS property, the pursuit of HIS own happiness. Only a being who is an end in himself can claim a moral sanction to independent action. If man existed to serve an entity beyond himself, whether God or society, then he would not have rights, but only the duties of a servant.” – Leonard Peikoff, “Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand”
Intrepid says
I think it’s time to re-up the “THX Altruism/Christianity” beer drinking game. You are in overdrive now.
THX 1138 says
The “self” according to Objectivism is your mind.
Christianity certainly does devalue the self. According to Christianity you are born innately evil, innately depraved, by virtue of Original Sin. You mind is inferior to God, your reasoning mind is defective and “limited”, God works in mysterious ways and your mind is too inferior to understand God’s will. In any conflict between you and God you must obey God and devalue your own judgement in deference to God.
According to Christianity man was created in the image of God, and given free will by God, but that is only one part of the full context of Christianity. The full context of Christianity is that man must seek Salvation through penance and renunciation for God, neighbor, stranger, and even enemy (turn the other cheek), in order to enter the Kingdom of Christ in the after-life. If man chooses the freedom to reject Christianity, God will punish man with eternal damnation in Hell. That is not freedom at all, not in any rational sense of the word.
Bear in mind that the Kingdom of Christ is not a Constitutional Republic defending individual rights and the personal pursuit of happiness but a KINGDOM where the Christian is the serf/servant of Christ.
“The early Christians did contribute some good ideas to the world, ideas that proved important to the cause of future freedom. I must, so to speak, give the angels their due. In particular, the idea that man has a value as an individual — that the individual soul is precious — is essentially a Christian legacy to the West; its first appearance was in the form of the idea that every man, despite Original Sin, is made in the image of God (as against the pre-Christian notion that a certain group or nation has a monopoly on human value, while the rest of mankind are properly slaves or mere barbarians). But notice a crucial point: this Christian idea, by itself, was historically impotent. It did nothing to unshackle the serfs or stay the Inquisition or turn the Puritan elders into Thomas Jeffersons. Only when the religious approach lost its power — only when the idea of individual value was able to break free from its Christian context and become integrated into a rational, secular philosophy — only then did this kind of idea bear practical fruit.” – Leonard Peikoff
Intrepid says
Still waitin’ on that rational secular philosophy to take hold, any minute now. Can ya feel it? Here it comes. I can almost see it. Hear it. Touch it.
Right there….to the left. Ah yes, Atheism, Communism, Nazism, socialism and Objectivism all rolled up into one big pile of abstract garbage. Now mixing with Islamism for good measure on college campuses.
Well done sir. Remember, don’t stray out of your predetermined lines and boundaries of enforced stupidity. Wouldn’t want you to trip and fall and hit your head.
Intrepid says
OMG, not THAT homework assignment for the one millionth time.
Your autism is showing again.
And she still won’t date you.
Polywog says
Where can I see this movie? It’s not in theaters near me. It’s not on Amazon prime. Where can I see it?
stephen cole says
It looks to be coming out on DVD in June according to the MovieInsider website.
https://www.movieinsider.com/m22607/irenas-vow
Mo de Profit says
Thank you for your review, I will definitely watch it soon.
Many Polish women were actual fighters particularly in the Warsaw Uprising. Sadly Poland does still suffer from some Jew hatred too.
Chris Lamb says
Is this the same person as the heroine of the book, Life in a Jar? Her name was Irena Stanislawa Sendler (nee Krzyzanowska).
Ron Wasserman says
This is the best and most thorough movie review I have ever read.
As for the activities of Poles during WW2, there many, varying and heroic. One survivor in Israel recounted to me how a Catholic guy noted for blatant, drunken anti-Jewish outbursts had hid him and his mother throughout the war. According to the survivor’s explanation, his Christianity must have overridden and shamed his contempt for Jews.
So, Poland not only produced great Poles, who proudly saved the lives of its Jews, Poland also produced goiod “anti-Semites.”