Those who make a business of projecting trends often neglect the acceleration factor. The march of history may be usefully described as “slowly” followed by “suddenly.” Yet we are rarely prepared for those times when history seems to “speed up,” and decades of change are compressed into years or even months. We assume that current trends will continue, and we are surprised when they don’t.
An excellent book on the subject is Tony Blankley’s The West’s Last Chance. Blankley, a nationally syndicated columnist who served President Reagan as a speechwriter and senior policy adviser, began the book with an overview of sudden changes in the course of history: the conquests of Alexander the Great, the French Revolution, the American Civil War, and the Nazi’s rapid takeover of much of Europe.
He then made the case that we are on the brink of another historical reversal of massive proportions—namely, the takeover of Europe by Islam. He suggested that the takeover would be accomplished through demographic changes rather than war and he further suggested that Europeans would mount little resistance to it.
According to Blankley, the lack of resistance would have its source in the fact that demographic changes move slowly and are thus less noticeable. One can see that an attacking army ought to be resisted, but the threat of rising birth rates seems a much less urgent matter.
Moreover, for much of the world the pre- 9/11 decades were a time of relative calm. For one thing, the differences between the West and the Soviet Union had been patched up. The liberal elites claimed that it was merely a case of mutual misunderstanding. The solution to most problems, it was asserted, was to understand the “other.” The best way to do that was to practice “political correctness”—a non-judgmental approach to political and social issues. Ironically, political correctness was the prelude to the highly judgmental ideology of “woke.”
According to political correctness, all cultures and religions are equally good and we have nothing to fear from the “other” except, perhaps, a mild case of heartburn from sampling his exotic dishes. As for Europe’s Muslim migrant problem, the multiculturalists assumed it would soon vanish. Once Muslims realized how warm and welcoming Europeans are, they would gladly assimilate to the host culture. But as Blankley realized in 2005 (the date of the book’s publication) things were not going as expected. Muslims were not assimilating, they were creating “no-go zones.” They were not adopting the liberal ways of the French and the Dutch, rather, they were importing the repressive customs of Morocco, Somalia, and Iran.
What was the problem? In answer, Blankley quoted Abraham Lincoln’s observation that “the dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present…As our case is new, so we must think anew, and act anew.”
But Europeans (and Americans) did not think anew or act anew. Faced with the entirely new situation created by the worldwide resurgence of Islam, they fell back on the inadequate dogmas of the quiet past. They fell back, in short, on political correctness and multiculturalism.
The chattering classes in Western societies insisted that what we needed was more understanding, more immigration, more welcoming, and more criticism of our own culture and heritage.
And more censorship and suppression, as well. Blankley worried that Europeans, blinded “by the effect of a politically correct mentality” would be unable to mount a sufficient resistance to Islamization. And he was right. But Europe’s political, academic, and media elites did mount a powerful resistance against anyone who, like Blankley, dared to bring up the subject of Islamization.
Indeed, concepts such as “Eurabia,” “Islamization,” and the “Great Replacement” were dismissed as anti-Muslim right-wing conspiracy theories. Moreover, prominent counter jihadists such as Italian author Oriani Fallaci, Dutch parliament member Geert Wilders, and Austrian citizen Elizabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff were put on trial for their views. Fallaci was charged with the made-up crime of “defaming a religion.”
But if the “Islamization of Europe” was nothing but a wild theory with no basis in fact why were the elites so anxious to suppress the free speech rights of Wilders and the others? And why was Wilder’s trial held in an underground bunker at Shipol Airport? Why was he surrounded day and night by a security detail? And why was he moved on an almost weekly basis from one safe house to another?
Obviously, there was a real threat, not a mere theory, and the authorities knew it. Numerous death threats had been made against Wilders, his colleague, ex-Muslim Ayaan Hirsi Ali, and many others.
Indeed, it was difficult to keep track of all the death threats and assassination attempts directed at those who criticized Islam. In 1989, the Ayatollah Khomeini issued a death fatwah against Salman Rushdie, the author of the Satanic Verses. As a result of the fatwa, assassination attempts (one of them successful) were made against three people connected with the book’s publication. In addition, a hotel-full of people was set on fire in Turkey. Thirty years after the fatwa, a would-be assassin stabbed Rushdie 13 times while he was giving a talk in Chautauqua, New York.
In 2006, worldwide protests over cartoons of Muhammad in a Danish newspaper led to over 200 deaths. When Charlie Hebdo, a French satirical magazine, reprinted the cartoons in 2015, its office was attacked by two gunmen who killed twelve.
A month later, an assassination attempt was made on Lars Vilks, a Swedish artist who drew uncomplimentary pictures of Muhammad. In the years following the exhibit of the drawings, Vilks was the target of two failed assassination plots and two violent attacks. In February, 2015 an assassination attempt on Vilks in Copenhagen left two dead and three wounded.
Three months later in Garland, Texas, two Muslim terrorists with automatic weapons attacked an art exhibit which featured images of Muhammad. The gunmen fired dozens of rounds at police outside the event, but were killed before they could get inside. Among their intended targets were Geert Wilders and prominent American Islam critics, Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller.
There have been several other assassination threats revolving around images of Muhammad, but I’m sure you get the picture. European authorities get the picture too, but they won’t admit it. That might be provocative. For example, police and other authorities in Rotherham, England knew about the rape and prostitution of 1400 teenage girls by Muslim “grooming” gangs over a decade-long period, but they didn’t do anything about it for fear of being thought “Islamophobic.”
The politically correct notion that one should only say nice things about people of other religions and ethnicities, had a paralyzing effect on European authorities. The desire to be non-offensive often prevented them from putting a stop to criminal and terrorist activities when they were still able to. Instead of acting, the authorities often looked the other way. The kind of resistance that Blankley and others called for—namely, government resistance—was in short supply
Which raises a question. Is it too late now? Tony Blankley’s The West’s Last Chance was written nearly twenty years ago. Has Western Europe already had its last chance?
The years 2005-2007 saw the publication of a number of important books on the Islamization of Europe: Blankley’s book, Bat Yeor’s Eurabia, Melanie Phillips’ Londonistan, Bruce Bawer’s While Europe Slept, Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s Infidel, Mark Steyn’s America Alone, and several others.
All of these books warned that Wester Europe was approaching a demographic tipping point after which the eventual dominance of Islam would be guaranteed. The warning, it seems, was largely ignored. The “alarmists” had their demographic data and startling anecdotes, but the elites had their pleasant narratives about the multicultural melting pot and the wonders of diversity. Moreover, they could point out that although the European birth rate was declining, so was the birth rate of European Muslims. Some said it was a mathematical impossibility for the Muslim population to exceed the native European population in the foreseeable future. So, not to worry.
But birth rate projections are a tricky business. They don’t always account properly for population growth through immigration. And in recent years we have seen massive numbers of Muslim migrants entering Europe—mostly from Northern Africa, but also from the Middle East and Turkey.
Another factor to consider is the one I mentioned at the outset of this piece—acceleration. As they begin to seem inevitable, demographic changes often go into a phase of acceleration.
A good example with which many older Americans are familiar is the phenomenon of “white flight.” The term refers to the migration of white people from racially mixed urban areas to racially homogenous suburban areas during the years 1950 to 1980. Eventually, the pace of this “flight” became quite rapid. As the migration of southern blacks to northern cities increased, so did the white migration to the suburbs.
The white flight was exacerbated by “blockbusting.” Real estate agents in some cities used various tactics to convince white homeowners that real estate values would plummet and crime would rise in their neighborhoods if they waited too long to sell. After convincing white owner to sell at a loss, the same agents would turn around and sell the houses to blacks at inflated prices. At one point in the city of Chicago, more than 100 real estate agencies were changing two to three blocks a week on average.
Researchers found that after the ratio of new residents to original residents reached a certain tipping point, the flight would escalate, often resulting in almost complete segregation of neighborhoods.
White flight is not confined to the U.S. Examples of the phenomenon can be found in South Africa, Zimbabwe, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, and the United Kingdom. It should be noted, however, that the “flight” often has more to do with the influx of new ethnic or religious minorities rather than new racial minorities.
That said, one of the main takeaways from the “white flight” phenomenon is that after a certain tipping point, demographic changes can occur quite rapidly. As that tipping point is approached, the soon-to-be-minority populations may suddenly opt to leave on short notice, thus creating an acceleration of the flight trend.
If we assume that the tipping point is somewhere in the vicinity of a 50/50 ratio, then many European cities are approaching that point. In a recent FrontPage article, Bruce Bawer points out that, if one includes illegal residents, Malmö, Sweden’s third largest city, already has a Muslim majority. Moreover, he observes that Muslim culture is rapidly replacing Swedish culture in that city.
Since such demographic trends are unlikely to reverse, one might conclude that Malmö’s last chance to remain a Western city has already passed.
The subtitle of The West’s Last Chance is “Will we win the clash of civilizations?”
That still an open question for America. But in Europe it’s a different story. Islam has a solid foothold in Western Europe. And the demographic changes are all in Islam’s favor. Any acceleration in these trends will be difficult to resist.
Besides, you can’t win a clash of civilizations if you won’t admit that one exists. Because the multicultural/woke mentality that grips Europe denies the possibility of a clash, Europeans will be woefully unprepared when it arrives. And there is much to suggest that it already has.
Formerly Christian based Europe has pretty much scrubbed the Christian faith rom their societies. Most have many more practicing Muslims than practicing Christians. The only real question is the timeline before the leaders of Europe are Muslims.
Islamic attacks are very rare of late – I suspect the attacks were waking people up to the potential danger, but as the attacks are rare now, the targeted nations are back in full sleep mode. When they return it’ll be much more coordinated and probably too late.
Another thing – Western leaders for the most part are atheistic and corrupt. I suspect they admire Islam and see themselves fitting in as the Emirs, Sultans, and Mullahs when Islam becomes the new Islamic states.
Put the European leaders aside. Could it be that many ordinary Europeans have simply become too rational and commonsensical to believe in all the mystical fairy tales and absurd myths of Christianity?
What makes you think that ordinary Europeans have not lost their faith in Christianity simply because after 2,000 years the supernatural claims of Christianity have simply become too untenable and irrational to believe? Men have landed on the Moon, men have found cures for diseases unimaginable to the first Christians 2,000 years ago, men have invented the car, the airplane, television, radio, computer technology, unimaginable 2,000 years ago. Men have discovered that happiness is possible on earth, a tragic sense of life, which is at the heart of religion, has been discredited by the Industrial Revolution and the Scientific Revolution.
But what element of Christianity is still deeply entrenched and thoroughly unquestioned by the vast majority of ordinary, rank and file, Europeans and Americans? The central and mystical-religious-supernatural moral code at the center of Christianity, the moral code of altruism and self-sacrifice. The same moral code which is the basis of Collectivism, Socialism, and Fascism.
“Put the European leaders aside. Could it be that many ordinary Europeans have simply become too rational and commonsensical to believe in all the mystical fairy tales and absurd myths of Christianity?”
That may be true, but their not replacing it with atheism, they’re allowing it to be replaced with Wokeism and the even more mystical fairy tales and absurd myths of Islam.
But according to your philosophy, these European atheists are being altruistic based on 2000 years of SUCCESSFUL Christianity.
Where’s the logic in that?
Besides that your argument is completely and utterly hiding the facts, distracting everyone from the reality that the cities of Europe are now overrun with migrants.
Nobody cares if it is because 3000 years ago someone said be kind to your neighbours and respect your parents it is a fact that these people are NOT refugees they are fake refugees almost all male of military age who are raping little girls and getting away with it.
Part 1
“Put the European leaders aside. Could it be that many ordinary Europeans have simply become too rational and commonsensical to believe in all the mystical fairy tales and absurd myths of Christianity?”
Absolutely not, though many think so. There’s a reason why Davos has become a center of pilgrimage for the global elite and why Europe is devastating itself through things like uncontrolled globalism, immigration, and the idea that we can scientifically manage everything from the economy to the global climate itself. And often on scant research.
Of course, that would play in to the tragic understanding of human nature. Which is something you do not want to address. That the abandonment of faith and the idealization of “reason” (or rather rationalization) does not lead inexorably to the grand Randian Utopia that you believe, but to its own form of irrational superstitions, self-destruction, and decadence. Which is why you continue to ignore it.
Part 2
“What makes you think that ordinary Europeans have not lost their faith in Christianity simply because after 2,000 years the supernatural claims of Christianity have simply become too untenable and irrational to believe?”
Simple. The Japanese have lived with Shintoism for at least 1,600 years of recorded history, and while they clock in terms of belief even lower than many Western Europeans they have not abandoned the faith or its rituals.
Moreover, the loss of faith doesn’t correlate solidly with the prevalence of Christianity or when it spread. Britain, Armenia, Italy, and Greece were among the first Christianized states in Europe. Armenia and Italy have remained so but Britain famously had the Beatles become “Bigger than Jesus” in the 1960s, and a much-smaller Greece falls somewhere in between.
Likewise, Ethiopia has been Christian for almost as long as Armenia has been but has not had similar collapse in faith, even in the face of the extremely brutal “scientific”, “rational” Communist dogma.
Part 3
In contrast, Poland, Hungary, Bulgaria, Sweden, Denmark, and Finland were Christianized late (VERY Late in many cases) in the game. But Poland and Hungary remain among the most devoutly Christian nations on the continent while Sweden and Denmark are among the most atheistic societies to have ever existed, with Bulgaria and Finland being somewhere in between.
The trends are pretty clear. “Disillusionment due to X years spent under Christianity” cannot explain the differences we see.
As you would know if you actually bothered to practice what you preach and THINK about the data, rather than just grabbing onto the first conclusion you get that flatters your preconcieved notions.
Also how ironic it is that you keep loudly insisting that Christianity set the stage for Communism while falling victim to one of the chief, root fallacies that underlay Communism: that of inexorable human progress. Which is one reason why accounts of reality stubbornly refuse to conform to your grandiose theories, you reach out for scape goats (hmm, how did scape goats originate again as? Oh right, religious superstition trying to wish Bad Karma away onto a sacrificial victim).
Part 4
Which is why you stubbornly blather about the “Thousand Year Christian Dark Ages” while completely ignoring things like the devastation of uncontrolled migration, the literal freezing of much of the Northern Hemisphere, Civil War, the Rise of Islam, Pagan Marauders, and so on…. as well as the endurance and relative prosperity of the Eastern Roman Empire (the regions of Europe that kept the best tally of your beloved idol Aristotle), albeit as a repressive Christian autocracy. It is just less painful for your prejudices.
Which is ironic because I’ve been much more open about talking about the downsides and upsides of things such as Greco-Roman Paganism, Judaism, Christianity, Islam, the assorted Germanic/Nordic Paganisms, and so on than you have. Because for whatever its shortfalls or issues, a creed based upon the idea that all have sinned and fallen short does not have to torture itself in droves to explain why civilization decays and people often help undermine their own achievements in comparison to one that idolizes Randian ubermensch.
It’s ironic how much you wind up perversely idolizing Thomas Aquinas (due to his necessary – if mostly imagined – role in “reintroducing Aristotle” to the Latin West that Rand – in her typical ignorance of the Classics – cobbled together) in spite of probably never having read The City of God and addressing its arguments and implications.
I don’t give a damn what “ISM” or “ity” prevails, why would anyone want to live in a caliphate?
Reject Islam or vanish as a civilization.
The secular religion which pervades our government and policy does not have the means by which to identify or resist the destruction of our nation or its people.
The answer is to return to the robust faith of our fathers. Our lives, our magistrates, our elections, our schools, our government, and ALL citizens who love this country will thrive.
See the plain and ugly truth. Islam is incompatible with citizenship. Deport. Deny. They prefer sharia. Let them render due reverence to its nasty and deplorable tenets in their homelands.
Same for all immigrants who are “economic.” We are becoming an economic zone to be managed in accordance with the new techno-tyrannical panopticon globalists.
I don’t want to return to the Christian Dark Ages, the 300 years of the bloody wars of the Reformation and the Counter Reformation, Cotton Mather and the New England Puritans, the Christian legal persecution of the Jews keeping them in their ghettos. I don’t want to return to the Roman Inquisition, the Spanish Inquisition, or the persecution and massacre of Christian heretics, the Massacre at Beziers in 1209 is but one of many. That’s what the robust Christian faith of our Christian fathers produced.
Christianity in general has a record of brutality so blatant that only a Christian could ignore or evade it.
Just more of your anti Christian rant. You should just go away.
Why do you want me to go away? Isn’t that the fearful reaction of a Leftist who will not tolerate a rational questioning, analysis, and examination of his faith?
Perhaps you can censor blasphemers, heretics, and infidels like me by passing blasphemy and heresy laws.
The so called rational atheists in the uk have introduced blasphemy laws but only for the religion of peace, we can criticise Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism or Buddhism but not islam.
Your arguments are illogical, deflective, hyperbolic, and irrelevant to the problem. You confuse econcomic and political motivators, and ignore that these problems were as prevalent, and typically more so in non -Christain societies. Western Civilization, inherited by the Greeks and evolved by Judea-Christain thought, has brought us self-correcting mechanisms.
Christianity in general has a record of brutality so blatant that only a Christian could ignore or evade it.
You definitely DO want to return to the so called dark ages, you return to them every single day.
Anti-Christ could come from anywhere. I presumed he would lay claim to the title of Messiah, and therefore would need to be both Jewish and in the line of David.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had Jewish roots, and so piqued my interest. Many Jews also fall into the camp of Sanballat and Tobiah.
But, all my surmise is just that. Anti-Christ could come from anywhere. The greatest power of evil is deception.
In my mind, Islam has three pillars of control: 1. Lie
2. Deceive
3. Subvert
Islam is evil.
Psalm 97:10 Ye that love the Lord, hate evil.
West: the resistant stub of Christendom not yet fallen ie. Europe.
The Cult of Jesus, the Cult of Abraham, and the Cult of Mohammed, are not Western, they are all Oriental invaders from the Middle-East of the Greco-Roman West.
What is the defining attribute that makes Western Civilization — CIVILIZED? A dedication to discovering and living by the facts of reality by using reason and logic to arrive at certainty about the facts of reality. When men live by reason, discovering and establishing the facts of reality, civility and peaceful cooperation supplant the force and brutality produced by faith in the unreal.
Where did reason, logic, and science begin? In the Western lands of Ancient Greece, above all in Athens, and above all in the rational philosophy and system of logic produced by Aristotle. It is Aristotle, not the Oriental Moses or Oriental Jesus, that is the father of the rational, scientific, and technological, aspects of Western Civilization.
The civilization of geopolitical ambition swallowed up two thirds of Christendom, leaving a European remainder referred to as The West.
What has this to do with Russia?
A philosophically and culturally speaking, Western nation, that is a nation predominantly orientated to reality, reason, logic, and science can collapse into irrationality and become philosophically Oriental, that is predominantly orientated towards unreason, faith, mysticism, and the unreal.
Such a cultural and philosophical re-orientation, from reason to unreason, is precisely what happened to Germany when it collapsed into the abject unreason of Nazism. Germany recovered from the irrationality of Nazism but has never recovered from the unreason of Collectivism-Socialism as such (neither has the rest of Europe) which is why it is now once again collapsing into another manifestation of the irrationality of Collectivism-Socialism-Fascism — suicidal Altruism-Globalism.
The opposite can also happen. An Oriental nation can change its orientation towards reason and become more rational. Japan is right now more Western than Germany.
Men have free will and therefore cultures and nations can become more rational or more irrational. A republic of reason, if you can keep it.
And feminists, mad left-wing-nut Jews, and homosexuals paved the way
Judaism prepared the ground for Christianity and Judeo-Christianity prepared the ground for both Islam and Communism.
The brutal theocracies Christianity produced were brutal.
Christianity in general has a record of brutality so blatant that only a Christian could ignore or evade it.
Rand’s so called philosophy will also become a brutal dictatorship of professors who decide what is rational.
Fear not, friend Mo; it will not become a brutal dictatorship because it will never catch on to that extent. Personally I find that some things about her philosophy make sense, but I doubt that the gestalt has any real attraction or staying power.
Just look how they treat women and gays in those middle East Countries
The West’s open invitation for Islam to invade and destroy it is only one more symptom of the West’s collapse into unreason.
If Islam did not exist the Marxist-Globalists would be partnering with Christianity to return the West to a religious Dark Age. In the end the Marxist will turn to religion because Marxism comes from religion, it is a crypto-religion mutation that will graft itself back unto religion and be re-integrated with religion.
“I believe that the medievals understood much better than the moderns on what basis to build a totalitarian society that would last and not collapse in less than a century. They did it. The people in the rising religious movement today, know that full-well…. Socialism is really helping religion. The bigger the statism, the more people are accustomed to government rule over everything, the more people are ready… for religionists to take over the lead away from the more secular side…. The socialists are building the basis for totalitarianism but only the religionists are going to cash in on it and take over.” – Leonard Peikoff
“Is religion more dangerous in America than socialism or collectivism?” https://peikoff.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/2009-07-20.071_B.L.mp3
If the now-threatened groups flee somewhere and also don’t reproduce, they’re really gone as a factor.
From Fiddler on the Roof : May God bless and keep the Czar…far away from us.
The Muslim Islamic quest to have Sharia law enacted in the different countries of Europe by insidious political, influence and influence is called the “stealth jihad.”
With this known it needs to be understood that the term used by many in the West in current times is “political Islam” That term is, in reality redundant. This is because Islam is in essence, a religious /political Sharia law based system. As so well explained in brief way, by the Muslim tyrant who and ruled Iran, Ayatollah Khomeini when he stated that “All Islam is politics.” [1]
[1] THE ISLAM IN ISLAMIC TERRORISM by Ibn Warraq , page 332.
Those stealth jihadists /Muslims with their insidious jihad-minded Muslims scheming for the subtle and not so subtle, Islamic conquest of Europe by every possible means, including the stealth and violent jihad which is, indeed, awful.
As explained by William Wagner in his book HOW ISLAM PLANS TO CHANGE THE WORLD .Which informs the reader n page 195 “Of all the continents of the world, Europe is probably the number one target by Muslim strategist who are seeking world dominance.”
Therefore, the Europeans would be wise to be on guard.
Islam is a security threat to the nations of Europe .So concerning the threats and dangerous behavior of the jihadists towards the people of the nations of Europe .This has been further explained and revealed by in the book , by Robert Spencer ,THE HISTORY OF THE JIHAD FROM MUHAMMAD TO ISIS .Which in page 367 informs the reader that “The early twenty- first century saw a sharp rise in jihad massacres perpetrated all over the West by individuals or small groups of Muslims: in London, Manchester, Paris, Toulouse, Nice ,Amsterdam, Madrid, Brussels, Berlin Munich ,Copenhagen…”
The Muslim scheme of the stealth jihad otherwise called the Muslim method of Islamic Gradualism to enact Sharia law in many different countries of Europe is in contrast to the way of the violent jihad or also called the militant jihad .This non-violent form of the jihad for Islam is a very sly, insidious, subtle and deceptive way of working for the advancement of Islam with its Sharia law.
This Muslim scheme for achieving the goal of the Islamic agenda is as, many times, as subtly effective as it is demonically clever. Furthermore, this Islamic gradualism, in some ways, is very similar to the instruction printed in the book entitled THE ART OF WAR by Sun Tzu. Which reads “At first, then, exhibit the coyness of a maiden, until the enemy gives you an opening; afterwards emulate the rapidity of a running hare, and it will be too late for the enemy to opposes you”
The United States in one of the nations of the West. With that awful pseudo “president” , Joe Biden , in the Oval Office of the White House , which is striving to gives those America hating Muslim tyrants of Iran everything they want and with Biden’s Red/Green alliance along with is sister friendship of Abbas of the PA.
The terrible horrendous harm that Biden had done to the United States is still doing and will continue to do is, the awful damage to the Western nation of the US might be irreversible . I really hope I’m wrong.
President imposter Joe Biden is leading America to ruin. The terrible harm that Biden is doing to the USA might even be irreversible. As Abraham Lincoln had said, “You can’t unscramble eggs.”
My experience in the West is that people who have not studied Islam judge it from the people they know from Muslim backgrounds. As a result, they tend to have positive impressions of nice people. I once warned a friend about the negative side of all the migrants, but she said they are ok. She was dating an asylum seeker in the home for them. One day the man started getting aggressive and she screamed for help from the supervisors. Now she avoids the house and the man. She learned from negative experience. Also, I notice that people on the liberal to leftist side do not want to be told anything negative about their favorite cultural and ethnic groups and about illegal migration or leftist policies in general. They avoid hearing anything that disagrees with their ideologies. So, of course, they would not favor stops on migration or cultural incursions against traditional western beliefs and practices.
How true, we all hold views of how others live but have no real idea until they live next door.
Democrats want Open Borders for all those future democrat voters we once called Illegal Aliens/Wetbacks while Taliban sneak over the border with them
Taliban, ISIS, Muslim Brotherhood
The names change but the actions remain the same.
Christians in many Muslim countries are being killed every month and churches are being destroyed. The European people better wake up and stop bringing them in every month as refugees or asylum seekers. Hungary and Italy are starting to change for the better thru better leaderships.
The tragedy might be that America has reached the end of her being a Republic. With the now corrupted FBI with its abuse of its power as observed that it took a sinister part in the insidious set up against the patriots on January 6, 2021 and the later FBI harassment of American Patriots who attended that January 6th rally and the Biden gulag for tyrant Joe’s political prisoners from the day of 1/6/22 and later the FBI raid invasion of residents of Donald Trump, along which many awful other event sines that have occurred since Biden took Office on 1/20/21 those are omens that are overwhelming that United States is come to the very end of her Republic. This is indeed, very tragic and sad.
It’s tragic and sad . As with the infected and thoroughly infiltrated leftist FBI and considering all the terrible harm Joe Biden has done to the United States is still doing and will continue to do is so very horrendously terrible that the damage might be irreversible . I really hope I’m wrong.
President imposter Joe Biden is leading America to ruin. The terrible harm that Biden is doing to the USA might even be irreversible. As Abraham Lincoln had said, “You can’t unscramble eggs.”
Not wanting to be overly negative and pessimistic but still keeping with the bounds of reality it’s possible that , maybe the terrible awful harm by that pseudo “president” , Joe Biden has done to the United States is still doing and will continue to do is so very horrendously terrible that the damage might be irreversible . I really hope that I’m wrong.
Unfortunately, I doubt that any reasonable person would say that you are wrong. I hope you are, too, but it’s not likely.
William Kilpatrick is his article mentioned the topic “White Flight.” From my own first hand experience, awful and from talking to my former neighbors from the first hand experience, terrible experience in a city of Pennsylvania things for the most part , were,sort of , endurable throughout the 1990’s until the year 2019 . The that year a crime wave hit that neighborhood. With both many robberies and much vandalism
I and many of neighbors then took part in White flight. I didn’t ask my neighbors where they heading to, but I moved miles away into a town by September 1, 2019. Since then , I found out my difference sources that things have gotten even worse in that neighborhood . There have been a number of shooting.
Not so many. But if only Lenin had missed that damned train, the world today would be a much better place.
That photo of those four lovely drop dead gorgeous muslim ”females” in hip black clothing sitting on a Bench and the one from the left is Aisha and the others are her Sisters and cousins all four are married to muhamad.